By Andrew Chia
Daniel Wong's Note: Seats are limited, so hurry! Book your seat now ;)
By Andrew Chia
As promised in my previous post, I shall reveal the mistakes that the investors of Maika Holding have made.
Take a loan to buy shares
As the stock market is a volatile investment vehicle, one should not take a loan to buy shares. One cannot be certain if the return on investment (ROI) will be profitable enough to cover the loan interest in the short term. If the ROI is low or not high enough to cover the loan interest, one could easily make a lost.
Confidence in Government-linked companies (GLC)
This is one of the myth that uninformed new investors are led to believe. In the past decades, history has shown that not all GLCs are well-managed and performed well financially. Some even have negative ROE! You may ask, "Aren't GLCs stable companies and won't go bankrupt because they are backed-up by the government?" It may be true that GLCs won't go bankrupt but one must always remember this fundamental investment principle: Share price movement is always fundamentally tied to the company's earnings. As there are better companies with better financial performance out there, why invest in a losing company (even though it's a GLC)?
Hop into the train too early
Many unwary investors lost money when they buy into IPOs or new investment scheme. To reduce the risk of losing money, it's wiser to wait for the company to mature for at least 10 years before deciding to hop into the 'train' or not. As there are many 'trains' with at least 10 years proven track record, why hop into the 'new train' with lots of uncertainty?
StarBizWeek's EUGENE MAHALINGAM spoke to a few Maika shareholders to gauge their sentiments then and now.
■ Lured by the potential of good returns, like thousands of others, retiree JESWANT KAUR, 64, took a loan to buy 5,000 shares in Maika. She was then assistant examiner at the Inland Revenue Board. Why has she held on to the shares for so long when many others have given up hoping and sold theirs? “I just kept the shares as I was quite confident something good will happen. After all, it's the MIC's investment arm and MIC is part of the Government. You can't really lose much,” she says. On what are her thoughts on the latest offer on the table by Tan Sri G. Gnanalingam, she seems quite upbeat. “At least I get back my money. Some people may have lost their capital but I will get mine back. What's the alternative? None. So I'm quite happy with the solution,” she says.
■ For lorry driver BALA (not his real name), 47, the Maika Holdings saga is a painful but distant memory. His father, now deceased, had purchased the shares. “Back then, my father, an oil palm estate worker, had heard about this (Maika) and was quite taken with what was being offered. I remember they promised a lot of things and my father felt that it would be a good investment,” says Bala, who lives in Rawang. “It was a very long time ago. I think my father had forgotten about it.” Bala's father only ear ned RM180 a mont h. “Although he didn't have much money, my father still wanted to invest. I remember him complaining in the past that Maika had promised so much but there was little to show for it.” According to Bala, just weeks before the recent Hulu Selangor by-election, he had “several visitors” who came over to speak to him and other Maika investors, on what seemed like a fact-finding mission to ascertain how many members were still active. “I'm not sure who they were. I gave them a photocopy of the details of my father's investments. But since the by-election, we have not heard from them,” he says. Naturally, Bala's patience to see a resolution to this Maika issue has thinned out.
■ ARULDASS SANDASAMY's father, a Maika shareholder, passed away 20 years ago. The father was then an estate worker earning RM200 a month. He bought 500 shares. His mother was also an estate worke r and they raised eight children. “My parents used up their savings to invest in Maika shares as they believed then it would earn them decent returns,” he recalls. Aruldass also remembers that they had received a couple of cheques over the years, which was probably dividend payouts in the early years. “We received a cheque twice for about RM30 but that's about it. Of course, my father was very unhappy with the returns. After putting in RM500, what happened to the rest of the money? Back then, RM500 was a lot of money. It's disheartening that we don't even know where the money went to.” After waiting for years, they simply “gave up hoping.”
■ K. CHANDRAGOPAL, 60, a retired teacher, laughs mockingly when asked about his investment in Maika. “It's so long ago. It's easy to forget! In fact, I had forgotten all about it until I read about our “white knight” (Tan Sri G. Gnanalingam),” he says. Chandragopal bought RM300 worth of shares in Maika. “A few of us teachers had invested in it because we thought there was a future. Unfortunately, it was all hype and talk, no action. “I feel sad and cheated about the whole thing. They really did promise us a lot but in the end, we got nothing. It feels like we Indians are always on the losing end.”
Daniel Wong's Note: Can you identify what are the mistakes that these investors had made? Try going through their stories again and see if you can identify them. I shall reveal the answer to you next week ;)
By TAY HAN CHONG
(Source: http://biz.thestar.com.my/news/story.asp?file=/2010/5/15/business/6250980&sec=business)
LAST Sunday was Mother's Day. It also marked the end of my son's first week at playschool.
Although it was only a two-hour trial session, his mother was not allowed to remain in school.
It was probably a lot more emotional for my wife than for my son as she lingered outside the school gates, straining her ears and listening for the familiar cries or perhaps the occasional laughter.
It was another milestone in the journey of life for my young son, and a milestone for my wife and I as parents.
Special meaning
Mother's Day holds special meaning for us, as our son was born on this day two years ago.
After a “stressful” week for the three of us, perhaps this is what my son might say if he could articulate it himself (Of course, I am making the assumption that I can read his mind and his heart): “My mother is a source of inspiration. She sacrificed her career to be with me every step of my way. I am indeed privileged. My mother is my pillar of strength. I was so relieved when I saw her after my first day at school. I tried to be strong, but I was very scared too.
“My mother is a source of comfort. Her kisses will make all sorts of pain go away. I am always comforted by her magical touch.”
Many would remember an old Chinese children's song that glorifies a mother's love for her children. Translated in English, it goes something like this:
“In the world only mothers are good. Children with mothers are like precious treasure. When one is in the embrace of one's mother, it is a blessing without compare...”
As far as I can remember, there has not been a song written about fathers with the same level of importance as when compared to songs written about mothers. Perhaps, in the past, fathers were the breadwinners and mothers the caregivers.
However, over time, fathers are becoming more involved in the parenting process.
In fact, I know of someone (let's call him EJ) who took a break from his career to spend time with his children. Now that his children are grown up, he has gone back to work.
A well-known personality and an accomplished journalist, he shares the opportunity cost of being at home with his children.
But he says it is well worth it. He went through the experience of seeing his children grow up first-hand.
From a financial perspective, the sacrifice or opportunity made by the stay-home caregiver can be easily computed in dollars and cents.
It is a very simple computation - monthly salary plus benefits plus annual bonus multiplied by the number of years, factoring in inflation and potential increment. This cost can be significant.
Intangible cost
On top of that, sacrifices made in the form of lifestyle adjustments, which are almost always required when a family with children changes from dual income to single income, also have to be taken into account.
This intangible social/family cost is less easy to compute but can be easily appreciated by most families.
Some might think that being a full time stay-home parent equates a life of luxury. My wife would be the first to refute that.
She is not living the life of a “tai tai”. For stay-home parents, life is physically tiring, emotionally draining and financially straining. No pay, no days off and no medical leave.
But just like EJ, my wife knows that it is indeed a privilege to be a stay-home mother. One does not get to hear from the maid or the caretaker how one's child took his very first step, how he articulated his first word, or even how he fell off the bed. My wife experienced all these first-hand.
Hence, allow me to be a contrarian and turn this equation of economic and social costs upside down. Spending time with our children is not a cost, but an investment.
A cost or investment?
What is the difference between a cost and an investment? A cost is an expense and outlay, just like a teh tarik, which costs RM1.40, or a holiday costing RM2,000.
But an investment is like a RM20,000 master's degree programme, a RM100,000 unit trust investment or a RM1mil shophouse.
When we think of investments, we automatically think of the payback and returns.
EJ had invested in his children and my wife is still investing in our child. Not only does EJ not regret his choice, he proudly proclaims that his “payback and returns” are his emotional wealth and experiences that are unique to him alone.
No amount of money can replace or replicate something as intangible as that. In fact, he says that he would do the same all over again.
My wife echoes that sentiment, and I know many stay-home parents will agree too.
To them, Mother's Day and Father's Day are not just days for them to receive a rose, a box of chocolates or a special meal.
It is a day when one receives the annual statement of one's time-honoured and privileged investment made in the names of one's own children.
There is no perfect guide to parenthood; no “control-alternate-delete” function to reboot and restart. Parenthood is tough and sometimes mistakes are made.
However, by being there to guide and love our children, hopefully we can raise them up to be the better person we all hope to be.
“Investment” is not always about money, and I quote Joyce Maynard: “It's not only children who grow. Parents do too. As much as we watch to see what our children do with their lives, they are watching us to see what we do with ours. I can't tell my children to reach for the sun. All I can do is reach for it, myself.”
To all mothers, hope you had a happy Mother's Day. And as for fathers, our moment of recognition will come next month!
■ Tay is senior vice-president and senior head of UOB's personal financial services division.
Original design by Blogging Secret | Sponsored by System Monitoring | Ads Theme Blogger Template